Comparative cytotoxicity of Turkish propolis extracts: solvent-dependent effects across eight cancer cell lines

Authors

  • Esra Dibek Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Köyceğiz Vocational School of Health Services, Pharmacy Services Program, Muğla, Turkey
  • Anara Babayeva Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Biology Program, Muğla, Türkiye
  • Merve Sezer Kürkçü Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Biotechnology Research Center, Muğla, Türkiye
  • Emine Sonay Elgin Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, College of Sciences, Department of Chemistry, Muğla, Türkiye
  • Ali Sorucu Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University Faculty of Milas Veterinary Medicine, Pharmacology and Toxicology Department, Muğla, Türkiye
  • İbrahim Kivrak Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Muğla Vocational School, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Treatment Technologies, Muğla, Türkiye
  • Bekir Çöl Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, College of Sciences, Department of Biology, Muğla, Türkiye

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56782/pps.845

Keywords:

Anticancer, Cytotoxicity, IC₅₀, MTT assay, Turkish propolis

Abstract

Propolis, a natural resinous bee product, has considerable potential as a source of anticancer agents. This study investigated the cytotoxic properties of Turkish propolis extracted with water (PWE) and 70% (v/v) ethanol (PEE) against a panel of eight cancer cell lines representing diverse tissue origins. Cytotoxicity was assessed using the MTT assay after 48 and 72 hours of exposure. Both extracts showed clear time and concentration dependent cytotoxic effects, but the 70% ethanolic extract (PEE) exhibited consistently greater potency across all cell lines. The 72 hour IC₅₀ values for PEE ranged from 17.22 ± 0.35 µg/mL to 51.78 ± 1.17 µg/mL, whereas PWE was markedly less active (IC₅₀ range from 45.27 ± 0.50 µg/mL to 642.13 ± 3.20 µg/mL). The cell lines most sensitive to PEE were HT-29 (colorectal adenocarcinoma), PC-3 (prostate adenocarcinoma), and MG-63 (osteosarcoma). These findings highlight the critical influence of the extraction solvents on the recovery of bioactive anticancer compounds. The superior efficacy of PEE suggests that the key anticancer components in Turkish propolis are more efficiently extracted with 70% ethanol. Overall, this study underscores the potential of Turkish propolis as a rich source of anticancer agents and contributes to the growing evidence supporting its chemopreventive and therapeutic properties.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Sawicka, D.; Car, H.; Borawska, M.H.; Nikliński, J. The anticancer activity of propolis. Folia Histochem. Cytobiol. 2012, 50, 25–37. DOI: 10.2478/18693 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5603/FHC.2012.0004

2. Choudhari, M.K.; Haghniaz, R.; Rajwade, J.M.; Paknikar, K.M. Anticancer activity of Indian stingless bee propolis: An in vitro study. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2013, 2013, Art. No: 928280. DOI: 10.1155/2013/928280 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/928280

3. Forma, E.; Bryś, M. Anticancer Activity of Propolis and Its Compounds. Nutrients 2021, 13, Art. No: 2594. DOI: 10.3390/nu13082594 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13082594

4. Rivera-Yañez, N.; Rivera-Yañez, C.R.; Pozo-Molina, G.; Méndez-Catalá, C.F.; Méndez-Cruz, A.R.; Nieto-Yañez, O. Biomedical Properties of Propolis on Diverse Chronic Diseases and Its Potential Applications and Health Benefits. Nutrients 2021, 13, Art. No: 78. DOI: 10.3390/nu13010078 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13010078

5. Balasubramaniam, A.K.; Elangovan, A.; Rahman, M.A.; Nayak, S.; Swain, D.; Babu, H.P.; Narasimhan, A.; Monga, V. Propolis: A comprehensive review on the nature’s polyphenolic wonder. Fitoterapia 2025, 183, Art. No: 106526. DOI: 10.1016/j.fitote.2025.106526 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fitote.2025.106526

6. Przybyłek, I.; Karpiński, T.M. Antibacterial Properties of Propolis. Molecules 2019, 24, Art. No: 2047. DOI: 10.3390/molecules24112047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24112047

7. Marcucci, M.C. Propolis: chemical composition, biological properties and therapeutic activity. Apidologie 1995, 26, 83–99. DOI: 10.1051/apido:19950202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/apido:19950202

8. Bankova, V.S.; de Castro, S.L.; Marcucci, M.C. Propolis: Recent advances in chemistry and plant origin. Apidologie 2000, 31, 3–15. DOI: 10.1051/apido:2000102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/apido:2000102

9. Kasote, D.; Bankova, V.; Viljoen, A.M. Propolis: chemical diversity and challenges in quality control. Phytochem. Rev. 2022, 21, Art. No: 1887–1911. DOI: 10.1007/s11101-022-09816-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11101-022-09816-1

10. Altabbal, S.; Athamnah, K.; Rahma, A.; Wali, A.F.; Eid, A.H.; Iratni, R.; Al Dhaheri, Y. Propolis: A Detailed Insight of Its Anticancer Molecular Mechanisms. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, Art. No: 450. DOI: 10.3390/ph16030450 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16030450

11. Hossain, R.; Quispe, C.; Khan, R.A.; Saikat, A.S.M.; Ray, P.; Ongalbek, D.; Yeskaliyeva, B.; Jain, D.; Smeriglio, A.; Trombetta, D.; Kiani, R.; Kobarfard, F.; Mojgani, N.; Saffarian, P.; Ayatollahi, S.A.; Sarkar, C.; Islam, M.T.; Keriman, D.; Uçar, A.; Martorell, M.; Sureda, A.; Pintus, G.; Butnariu, M.; Sharifi-Rad, J.; Cho, W.C. Propolis: An update on its chemistry and pharmacological applications. Chin. Med. 2022, 17, Art. No: 100. DOI: 10.1186/s13020-022-00651-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13020-022-00651-2

12. Castro, S.L. Propolis: Biological and Pharmacological Activities. Therapeutic Uses of This Bee-product. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Sci. 2001, 3, 49–83. DOI: 10.5016/1806-8774.2001v3p49 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5016/1806-8774.2001v3p49

13. Béji-Srairi, R.; Younes, I.; Snoussi, M.; Yahyaoui, K.; Borchard, G.; Ksouri, R.; Frachet, V.; Wided, M.K. Ethanolic extract of Tunisian propolis: chemical composition, antioxidant, antimicrobial and antiproliferative properties. J. Apic. Res. 2020, 59, 917–927. DOI: 10.1080/00218839.2020.1732572 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.2020.1732572

14. Degirmencioglu, H.T.; Guzelmeric, E.; Yuksel, P.I.; Kırmızıbekmez, H.; Deniz, I.; Yesilada, E. A New Type of Anatolian Propolis: Evaluation of Its Chemical Composition, Activity Profile and Botanical Origin. Chem. Biodivers. 2019, 16, Art. No: e1900492. DOI: 10.1002/cbdv.201900492 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cbdv.201900492

15. Anjum, S.I.; Ullah, A.; Khan, K.A.; Attaullah, M.; Khan, H.; Ali, H.; Bashir, M.A.; Tahir, M.; Ansari, M.J.; Ghramh, H.A.; Adgaba, N.; Dash, C.K. Composition and functional properties of propolis (bee glue): A review. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2019, 26, 1695–1703. DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2018.08.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2018.08.013

16. Campoccia, D.; Ravaioli, S.; Santi, S.; Mariani, V.; Santarcangelo, C.; De Filippis, A.; Montanaro, L.; Arciola, C.R.; Daglia, M. Exploring the anticancer effects of standardized extracts of poplar-type propolis: In vitro cytotoxicity toward cancer and normal cell lines. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 141, Art. No: 111895. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111895 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111895

17. Dibek, E.; Babayeva, A.; Elgin, E.S.; Sezer Kürkçü, M.; Çöl, B. Genome-wide screen of Escherichia coli Keio mutant line identifies genes related to propolis effect. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2025, 251, 429–448. DOI: 10.1007/s00217-024-04642-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-024-04642-5

18. Elgin, E.S.; Çatav, Ş.S.; Babayeva, A.; Kim, H.; Dibek, E.; Çöl, B.; Chae, Y.K.; Kıvrak, İ. NMR metabolomics analysis of Escherichia coli cells treated with Turkish propolis water extract reveals nucleic acid metabolism as the major target. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2023, 134, Art. No: lxac031. DOI: 10.1093/jambio/lxac031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jambio/lxac031

19. Babayeva, A.; Dibek, E.; Kıvrak, İ.; Çöl, B. The cytotoxic effects of Turkish bee venom (Apis mellifera) on selected cancer cell lines. Int. J. Pept. Res. Ther. 2024, 30, Art. No: 53. DOI: 10.1007/s10989-024-10622-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10989-024-10631-9

20. Babayeva, A.; Mammadov, R.; Atay, M.Ö.; Çöl, B. Cytotoxic, Antioxidant, and Antimicrobial Activities of Inula graveolens and Inula viscosa: Solvent-Dependent Bioactivity and Therapeutic Potential. Biol. Bull. 2025, 52, 197–205. DOI: 10.1134/S1062359025601983 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062359025601983

21. Oršolić, N. A review of propolis antitumour action in vivo and in vitro. J. ApiProd. ApiMed. Sci. 2010, 2(1), 1-20. DOI 10.3896/IBRA.4.02.1.01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3896/IBRA.4.02.1.01

22. Oršolić, N.; Jazvinšćak Jembrek, M. Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Propolis and Its Polyphenolic Compounds against Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, Art. No: 10479. DOI: 10.3390/ijms231810479 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810479

23. Pierański, M.K.; Kaniowski, D.; Szweda, P. Therapeutic Potential of Propolis in Preclinical Models of Cancer and Infectious Diseases: A Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, Art. No: 8041. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26168041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26168041

24. Sorucu, A.; Oruç, H.H. Determination of biologically active phenolic compounds in propolis by LC–MS/MS according to seasons and altitudes. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2019, 13, 2461–2469. DOI: 10.1007/s11694-019-00166-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-019-00166-9

25. Kekeçoğlu, M.; Sorucu, A. Determination of the effect of green extraction solvents on the phenolic acids and flavonoids of propolis. J. Res. Vet. Med. 2022, 41, 49–54. DOI: 10.30782/jrvm.937418 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30782/jrvm.937418

26. Sorucu, A.; Özdemir, N.; Muz, M.N.; Oruç, H.H.; Orman, A. LC-MS/MS analysis of red and green Türkiye propolis and determination of correlations between certain phenolic compounds. J. Apic. Res. 2025, 64, 1132–1141. DOI: 10.1080/00218839.2025.2515312 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.2025.2515312

27. Sezer Kürkçü, M.; Genç, D.; Çöl, B. Caffeic Acid’s Influence on the Viability and Apoptosis of a Diverse Array of Cancer Cell Lines. J. Adv. Res. Nat. Appl. Sci. 2025, 11, 95–106. DOI: 10.28979/jarnas.1645815 DOI: https://doi.org/10.28979/jarnas.1645815

Downloads

Published

2026-05-03

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Comparative cytotoxicity of Turkish propolis extracts: solvent-dependent effects across eight cancer cell lines . (2026). Prospects in Pharmaceutical Sciences, 24(2), 90-97. https://doi.org/10.56782/pps.845

Similar Articles

1-10 of 52

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.